Research: quick summary
- Lesley Goddard
This page is intended to show all research, that we reference, in alphabetical order by first named researcher.
Each has either a summary by us (in regular text)
or a quote or quotes from the researchers (in this quote format)
and sometimes also
a link to where we talk about the reference within this, the Customer Knowledge Base
a link to a freely available copy of the article.
- 1 Agarwal et al 2016
- 2 Bjork 1992
- 3 Black 2001
- 4 Cox 2008
- 5 Dunning et al 2013
- 6 Dunlosky et al 2013
- 7 Ebbinghaus 1885
- 8 Education and Training Inspectorate 2016
- 9 EEF 2014
- 10 EEF 2018
- 11 EEF 2021a
- 12 EEF 2021b
- 13 EEF 2021c
- 14 EEF 2021d
- 15 EEF 2021e
- 16 EEF 2023
- 17 El-Hage et al 2006
- 18 Elliot 2010
- 19 Farah et al 2006
- 20 Gathercole 2008
- 21 Gobet 2005
- 22 Gobet 2012
- 23 Goddard 2020a
- 24 Goddard 2020b
- 25 Goddard 2022
- 26 Hattie 2007
- 27 Hattie 2013
- 28 Hogan 1997
- 29 Holmes 2018
- 30 Holmes 2010
- 31 Kang 2016
- 32 Kang 2014
- 33 Kluger 1996
- 34 Kofler et al 2020
- 35 Koh 2018
- 36 Kornell 2009
- 37 Kulik 1990
- 38 Larkin 2001
- 39 Manning 2021
- 40 Mayfield 2002
- 41 Moran 2016
- 42 Oakley and Sejnowski
- 43 PAK-UK 2013
- 44 Pan and Sana 2021
- 45 Pashler 2007
- 46 Ramirez 2017
- 47 Rohrer and Taylor 2006
- 48 Rohrer 2009
- 49 Rowe et al 2019
- 50 Schiefele 1995
- 51 Stewart 2018
- 52 Sweller 1998
- 53 Taylor 2010
- 54 van de Pohl 2010
- 55 van Merrienboer 1997
- 56 Wiggins 2012
- 57 Wiliam 2009
- 58 Wiliam 2013
- 59 Wiliam 2016
Agarwal et al 2016
The benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity.
Agarwal, P.K., Finley, J.R., Rose, N.S., & Roediger H.R., Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity Memory 25(6):1-8 August 2016
Bjork 1992
Easy to recall? then practice won’t add much to storage strength in Long Term Memory
Hard to recall? then practice will significantly increase storage strength in Long Term Memory
They coined the phrase desirable difficulties.
Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. Healey, S. Kosslyn & R. Shriffin (Eds) From Learning processes to Cognitive Processes: essays in Honor of Willaim K Estes (Vol 2 pp 35-67) Hillside NJ: Erlbaum
Black 2001
"What is needed is a culture of success, backed by a belief that all can achieve. Formative assessment can be a powerful weapon here if it is communicated in the right way.”
"The formative assessment experiments produce typical effect sizes of between 0.4 and 0.7 : such effect sizes are larger than most of those found for educational interventions.
• A gain of effect size 0.4 would improve performances of pupils in GCSE by between one and two grades.
• A gain of effect size 0.7, if realised in the recent international comparative studies in mathematics (TIMSS—Beaton et al., 1996), would raise England from the middle of the 41 countries involved to being one of the top 5.
Cox 2008
The gap between high- and low-achieving students was extended following the transition to secondary school.
Cox, S. & Kennedy, S. (2008). Students’ achievement as they transition from primary to secondary schooling: Report no. 1 on the students’ transition from primary to secondary schooling study. Research and Evaluation Team, Research Division, Ministry of Education, New Zealand.
Dunning et al 2013
Q: Does Working Memory Training lead to improvements outside of the training? A: Not very usefully. They say: “First, training in low WM children leads to generalized enhancements to a wide range of untrained WM tasks. Second, these gains do not translate into capacity improvements on ecologically valid measures of WM or to gains in academic progress”
Dunning, D.L., Joni Holmes, J. and Gathercole, S.E. Does working memory training lead to generalized improvements in children with low working memory? A randomized controlled trial Developmental Science 16:6 (2013), pp 915–925
Dunlosky et al 2013
Practice testing and distributed (over time) practice (a.k.a. retrieval practice) are the only 2 of the 10 techniques considered which are given their “high-utility” rating.
Dunlosky, D., Rawson, K.A., Marsh, E.J., Nathan, M.J., Willingham, D.T., Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, January 2013
Ebbinghaus 1885
Did experiments to find out how we forget. He called a graph showing this die Vergessenskurve or in English the forgetting curve. It shows that as time goes on, memory fades.
See retrieval practice and increasing interval retrieval practice
Education and Training Inspectorate 2016
With respect to low attainment and poor attendance:
While the correlation is evident, causation is more complex.
Part 1 Attendance in schools, DfE
EEF 2014
"Since the spacing effect was first discovered by Ebbinghaus in 1885, research has consistently shown that learning performance improves if multiple study sessions are separated in time (or “spaced”) rather than massed together.” (page 29-30)
They summarise that the “strength of evidence for educational effectiveness” of retrieval practice is high. (Page 10)
A Review of Educational Interventions and Approaches Informed by Neuroscience
EEF 2018
The evidence indicates a large dip in mathematical attainment as children move from primary to secondary school in England, which is accompanied by a dip in learner attitudes. There is very little evidence concerning the effectiveness of particular interventions that specifically address these dips. However, research does indicate that initiatives focused on developing shared understandings of curriculum, teaching and learning are important. Both primary and secondary teachers are likely to be more effective if they are familiar with the mathematics curriculum and teaching methods outside of their age phase. Secondary teachers need to revisit key aspects of the primary mathematics curriculum, but in ways that are engaging and relevant and not simply repetitive. Teachers’ beliefs about their ability to teach appear to be particularly crucial for lower-attaining students in Key Stage 3 mathematics … Evidence indicates a significant dip in mathematical attainment at transition. For example, in a large national study of primary attainment in England, Brown et al. (2008) found that, at the end of Year 7, a full year after the transition to secondary school, learners’ performance on a test of primary numeracy was below their performance at the end of Year 6 (page 163)
“there is no research evidence concerning the effectiveness of specific interventions in this area … Although some of the studies were conducted some time ago, there is no reason to suppose that the current situation is any different”(page 164)
Hodgen, J., Foster, C., Marks, R., & Brown, M. (2018). Evidence for Review of Mathematics Teaching: Improving Mathematics in Key Stages Two and Three: Evidence Review. London: Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evidence-summaries/evidencereviews/improving-mathematics-in-key-stages-two-and-three/
EEF 2021a
Retrieval practice
The findings in this area are mostly positive, suggesting moderate effect sizes, but there were an appreciable number of neutral or negative results. (page 78)
“The overall evidence is therefore positive for retrieval practice. One area of concern in the main results was the low ecological validity of the studies in the review: many interventions were wholly scripted with a standardised procedure.” (page 92)
Cognitive Science in the classroom - Evidence and practice review
… but are the benefits of spacing and retrieval practice additive?
“For example, many teachers and practice review sources firmly linked retrieval practice and spaced practice. Both are forms of desirable difficulty for which the effects may not be entirely additive, as explained in a point by Putnam and Roediger:
‘Combining retrieval practice with spacing creates an interesting situation, however, because retrieval practice is more effective when it is successful, but increasing the gaps between retrieval practice opportunities makes retrieval more difficult (less successful). Thus, the positive effects of spacing and retrieval practice may be working against one another, at least when no feedback is provided on the test.’ (Putnam and Roediger, 2018, p. 177) page 84.
However if one can get the timing right, and timely practice usually can, one can increase the spacing between retrieval practices and ensure the learner is successful (because the timing is personalised, so one can gradually increase the durability of recall-ability) we should see the benefits of retrieval practice and spacing.
EEF 2021b
Research on teaching using worked examples
“suggests a small to moderate positive effect of using worked examples for secondary-age students in maths and science, compared to conventional problem-solving techniques” (page 104)
Cognitive Science in the classroom - Evidence and practice review
EEF 2021c
Teaching using scaffolding
Overall, evidence suggests that well-targeted scaffolds, guidance, or schema-based supports are an effective approach to support students to solve problems or learn from complex tasks in Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 4 (age 8 to 16) in a range of subjects. (page 111)
Cognitive Science in the classroom - Evidence and practice review
EEF 2021d
Managing cognitive load
Overall, the evidence is promising and indicates the value and importance of teachers seeking to optimise learners’ cognitive load. There are numerous studies showing appreciable positive effects for strategies to manage cognitive load within the evidence we have. There are also appreciable numbers of neutral and negative results, suggesting complexity in the principles and challenges of making it work in practice. (page 118)
and
Our confidence is in the value of optimising cognitive load rather than a specific strategy for doing so, or for specific learner needs.’ The main results also suggested great complexity and practical challenges for optimising cognitive load in practice. (page 134)
Cognitive Science in the classroom - Evidence and practice review
EEF 2021e
Within-class attainment grouping
Since Danielle Mason 2018 EEF Blog: Grouping pupils by attainment, what does the evidence say?
“Within-class attainment grouping’ shows a positive average attainment impact, equivalent to around +3 months of additional progress.”
The impact has been downgraded to + 2 months
EEF 2023
The attainment gap grows as learners progress through the education system, meaning that it is at its widest when learners reach the post-16 stage. Failing to achieve a standard pass in GCSE Maths or English has significant impacts on learners’ lives:
• Learners with 5 or more GCSEs, including English and Maths, as their highest qualification are estimated to earn £100,000 more in their lifetime than those with below level 2 or no qualifications.
El-Hage et al 2006
Learners living with trauma are likely to have a smaller working memory capacity than their peers.
El-Hage, W., Gaillard, P., isingrini, M., Belzung, C., Trauma-related deficits in working memory, February 2006, Cognitive Neuropsychiatry
Elliot 2010
When primary school teachers use strategies which reduce the working memory requirements of tasks, proved to be a predictor of the progress of learners with smaller working memory relative to their peers with a larger working memory capacity.
Elliott, J., Gathercole, S.E., Alloway, T.P., Holmes, J. & Kirkwood, H. An Evaluation of a Classroom-Based Intervention to Help Overcome Working Memory Difficulties and Improve Long-Term Academic Achievement. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 9, 227-250
See also smaller working memory
Farah et al 2006
Learners living with poverty are likely to have a smaller working memory capacity than their peers.
Farah M.J., Shera, D.M., Savage, J.H., Betancourt, L., Giannetta, J.M., Brodsky, N.L., Malmud, E.K., Hurt, H. Childhood poverty: Specific associations with neurocognitive development. Brain Res 1110 : 166 - 174
See also smaller working memory
Gathercole 2008
“The majority of children with poor working memory are slow to learn in the areas of reading, maths and science, across both primary and secondary school years”.
Learners with smaller working memories experience a double whammy of disadvantage
they are less likely to build chunks in long-term memory after the lesson than their peers,
they are more dependent on chunks in long-term memory to process the content of lessons than their peers.
Learning difficulties arise because they
“are unable to meet the memory demands of many structured learning activities” and “as a consequence, their working memory becomes overloaded ... information that is needed to guide the ongoing learning activity ... is lost”.
Gobet 2005
“Use an ‘improving spiral’, where you come back to the same concepts and ideas and add increasingly more complex new information”
Deliberate practice of similar but different problems assists the learner in building chunks in long term memory, which enables learning to be retained. Chunks also provide perceptual cues or triggers, so that the expert (or in our case the low attaining learner) can quickly and easily decide which chunk or chunks are likely to be useful to help solve a given problem.
Gobet, F. (2005). Chunking models of expertise: Implications for education. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 183-204.
Gobet 2012
A clear prediction of chunk-based theories is that individual differences play a large role in the early stages of learning
A clear prediction of chunk-based theories is that individual differences play a large role in the early stages of learning, as is typical of classroom instruction, but tend to be less important after large amounts of knowledge have been acquired through practice and study.
Chunk-based models actually warn us against any excess of optimism in the use of new technologies, as long as they do not help circumvent the key limiting constants of human cognition (i.e. attention, STM = working memory , and learning rates).
Gobet, F & Lane, P 2012, Chunking mechanisms and learning. in NM Seel (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, pp. 541-544.
Goddard 2020a
Comparing 2 years maths teaching from the 4 lowest attaining sets, we find the timely practice class increases the median GCSE score from year 9 to year 11, more than the 3 business as usual classes (2 of which were previously more highly attaining).
Goddard 2020b
Guidance on the most worthwhile activities during lockdown:
Factoring in retrieval practice to remote education activities will help [the teacher] to maintain firm foundations for when learning hopefully continues back in school in September. This must be our priority: extending the durability of current learning, with the icing on the cake being new learning.
Much retrieval practice in schools is still inadvertent. End-of-unit and end-of-term tests are high-stakes, summative assessments. These can and should be missed out during school closure. Instead we should use well-timed retrieval practice to embed learning. For low, middle and high-attaining learners the suggested wait between teaching and first practice is 1 to 3 days, 7 to 10 days and 14 days respectively
Goddard 2022
Two types of scaffolding make learning easier for learners with smaller working memories and/or learners who are likely to recall new learning for less time (e.g. up to a few days) than their peers (e.g. a week or more)
completion (either of a scaffold diagram fractionADDsub or of a partial solution givenXsign )
gradually increasing complexity ( inequality and simplifyPQ )
Our evidence comes from proportion of retrieval practice questions which are given feedback and/or given BELL = BEst Learned Later assessment outcomes.
Hattie 2007
The most effective forms of feedback provide cues or reinforcement to learners; are in the form of video-, audio-, or computer-assisted instructional feedback; and/or relate to goals.
The Power of Feedback REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 2007 77: 81 DOI: 10.3102/003465430298487 John Hattie and Helen Timperley is behind a pay wall here is a summary
See feedback
Hattie 2013
The Goldilocks principle of challenge, not too hard and not too easy. Let learners deliberately practice and coach them to help learners reduce the gap between where they are and where they want to be.
see 10:30 know deeply what the learners know already and share what success looks like
Hogan 1997
8 top tips on scaffolding
Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (Eds.). (1997). Scaffolding learner learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
See scaffolding and fading scaffolding
Holmes 2018
A small proportion of learners with smaller working memory capacities, don’t go on to become low attaining learners in maths, but most do.
Joni Holmes - Working memory and classroom learning, Cambridge University Press ELT 2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUxo5s8HHcE
Holmes 2010
Place holding problems, missing steps and giving up are clearly cited, as working memory overload symptoms. (However, muddling methods, my 3rd sign of working memory overload for maths teachers - a combination of place holding and missing steps isn’t given).
Joni Holmes, Susan E. Gathercole, and Darren L. Dunning, Poor Working Memory: Impact and Interventions. In Joni Holmes, editor: Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 39, Burlington: Academic Press, 2010, pp. 1-43. ISBN: 978-0-12-374748-8
Kang 2016
When learners do repeated retrieval practice attainment is raised.
Kang, S.H.K. (2016) Spaced Repetition Promotes Efficient and Effective Learning: Policy Implications for Instruction. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3 (1), 12-19
See retrieval practice and increasing interval retrieval practice
Kang 2014
Expanding interval, as opposed to fixed-interval, retrieval practice is more efficient.
Retrieval practice over the long term: Should spacing be expanding or equal-interval? Kang, S.H.K., Lindsey, R.V., Mozer, M.C., and Pashler, H. Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014
See retrieval practice and increasing interval retrieval practice
Kluger 1996
Feedback should be about how to improve the task and not ego involving
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
See feedback
Kofler et al 2020
Working memory deficits appear to be present in upwards of 3 out of every 4 ADHD cases
Kofler, M. J., Singh, L.J., Soto, E.F., Chan, E.S.M., Miller, C.E., Harmon, S.L. and Spiegel, J.A. (2020) Working memory and short-term memory deficits in ADHD: A bifactor modeling approach. Neuropsychology. 2020 Sep; 34(6): 686–698.
Koh 2018
Bite-Sized lectures (3 x 20 minute lecture + practice sessions) show statistically significant improvements in assessed learning outcomes over the traditional one hour lecture.
Koh, N. S., Gottipati, S. and Shankararaman, V. Effectiveness of bite-sized lecture on student learning outcomes. (2018). 4th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’18), Valencia, Spain, 2018 June 20-22: Proceedings. 515-523. Research Collection School Of Information Systems.
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/4075
Kornell 2009
The title says it all: Unsuccessful Retrieval Attempts Enhance Subsequent Learning
Kornell et al 2009 Nate Kornell, Matthew Jensen Hays, and Robert A. Bjork Journal of Experimental Psychology Vol. 35, No. 4, 989–998
Kulik 1990
When teachers hold back from teaching new learning until the learners have mastered all the pre-requisite skills, attainment is raised.
Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis Kulik, C.C., Kulik, J.A., & Bangert-Drowns, R.L.
See mastery learning
Larkin 2001
Through interviewing teachers experienced in scaffolding, she gives 5 top tips. I’ve found these more useful than Hogan' s 8 top tips.
See scaffolding and fading scaffolding
Manning 2021
Medical residents were taught with 4 to 5 brief (8 minute) teaching micro-sessions instead of one 40 to 50 minute teaching session.
The BST group scored significantly higher than the control group. However there was no significant difference in post test scores between BST and control groups in tests two and six weeks later. (page 8 )
Mayfield 2002
For what we consider higher order skills, such as generalising and problem solving, research suggests, Mayfield & Chase (2002), that when students are using two different pieces of knowledge/skills/methods to learn a third, the students are most successful if both the two existing pieces of knowledge/skills/methods are more strongly embedded before the third is learned.
Mayfield & Chase (2002). The effects of cumulative practice on mathematics problem solving. Journal of applied behavioural analysis, 35, 105-123. Spaced Repetition for Efficient Learning
Moran 2016
Anxiety effectively reduces working memory capacity.
whether [anxiety is] self-reported or experimentally induced it is related to poorer performance across a wide variety of tasks.
Moran TP. Anxiety and working memory capacity: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychol Bull. 2016 Aug;142(8):831-864. doi: 10.1037/bul0000051. Epub 2016 Mar 10. PMID: 26963369
Oakley and Sejnowski
Week 1: Learning How to Learn - Introduction to the Focused and Diffuse Modes big thinking and small thinking can’t be done at the same time, try the 4 minute video (with adverts) or sign up to the course for free (see link below)
Week 2: chunk based theory - see the 48 minutes of videos on building and using chunks.
Learning How to Learn: Powerful mental tools to help you master tough subjects
PAK-UK 2013
Executive Function difficulties and smaller Working Memory Capacity are among a number of learning difficulties that looked after children seem to experience.
Pan and Sana 2021
investigated the relative efficacy of pre testing (i.e., errorful generation) and post testing (i.e., retrieval practice).
Pre testing involves taking tests before to-be-learned information is studied,
whereas post testing involves taking tests after information is studied.
The key phrase used to describe this is test potentiated learning.
The experiments are all based on learning from reading a passage of text - so may not be as applicable to maths learning. If one only allows one test, then pretesting seems to be more effective than posttesting.
Of course if one wants to extend recall beyond the 48 hour delay and and one allows several retrieval practice questions, then retrieval practice with feedback can be expected to be more effective. Nonetheless pretesting, can be a valuable tool.
Pashler 2007
Giving feedback when the learner can’t retrieve (recall the learning) makes retrieval practice more effective. Feedback after a nights sleep is more effective than immediate feedback.
Pashler, Rohrer, Cepeda & Carpenter (2007). Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences. Pyschonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14 (2) 187-193
Overlearning, getting learners to practise more questions once the learners have “got the skill”, adds little durability to learning.
See feedback
Ramirez 2017
"Educators assume that students are motivated to retain what they are taught. Yet, students commonly report that they forget most of what they learn, especially in mathematics ... this proof-of-concept study suggests that children may deal with threatening classroom experiences by forgetting important course relevant knowledge."
Motivated Forgetting in Early Mathematics: A Proof-of-Concept Study Front Psychol. 2017; 8: 2087.
Published online 2017 Dec 4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02087
See maths anxiety
Rohrer and Taylor 2006
Overlearning, the most popular method for embedding learning in learners in maths lessons - doesn’t despite its great name - work very well. Even just one retrieval practice attempt makes significant improvements to the retention of maths learning than overlearning does.
Rohrer, D. & Taylor, K. (2006) The effects of overlearning and distributed practice on the retention of mathematics knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1209-1224.
See overlearning
Rohrer 2009
When learners see a list of problems, all of the same kind, they know the strategy to use before they even read the problem [that's] like riding a bike with training wheels. [With mixed practice] each problem is different from the last one, which means kids must learn how to choose the appropriate procedure — just like they had to do on the test.
Rohrer, D. (2009). The effects of spacing and mixing practice problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 4-17
Rowe et al 2019
Improving executive function is the key to improving working memory. WM training may have some positive effect, but so does physical activity, fantastical play! They say “Both direct training on WM tasks and practicing certain skills that may indirectly impact on WM (physical activity, fantastical play and inhibition) were beneficial. The common ingredient across effective interventions was the executive-loaded nature of the trained task i.e., training on a task that taps into attentional and processing resources under executive control not just the storage of information.” but “The strength of the evidence is tempered by a lack of clear theoretical underpinnings, rigorous methodology and consideration of dosage.”
Rowe, A., Titterington, J., Holmes, J., Lucy Henry, L. and Taggart, L. Interventions targeting working memory in 4–11 year olds within their everyday contexts: A systematic review. Developmental Review Volume 52, June 2019, Pages 1-23
Schiefele 1995
Although culturally we believe motivation is the driver i.e. that motivation increases success, in fact the driver is success, success increases motivation.
Schiefele, U., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. Motivation and Ability as Factors in Mathematics Experience and Achievement, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 26, No. 2, (March 1995), pp 163-181
Stewart 2018
Ordinarily between six weeks and 1.8 months of maths learning is lost during the summer holiday.
Stewart, Watson & Campbell: The cost of school holidays for children from low income families. Childhood, Vol 25, 2018.
Sweller 1998
“Schema construction has two functions: the storage and organization of information in long- term memory and a reduction of working memory load.”
People have very limited working memory capacities so attempting reasoning in working memory is inefficient and often error prone. Whereas prior problem solving, which helps us create schema (a.k.a. chunks) helps us to automate future problem solving. it is assumed this is because this gives us more working capacity for the unfamiliar parts of a problem. Even a very complex schema can be used by working memory as a single element. Building and using an increasing number of ever more complex schemas, by
“combining elements of lower level schemas in long term memory”
allows skilled performance to develop.
When teachers teach the “right grain size” attainment is raised (summary of van Merrienboer 1997)
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J.J.G., & Paas, F.G.W.C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
Taylor 2010
When practice problems are blocked, however, learners can successfully solve a set of practice problems without learning how to pair a problem with the skill. Indeed, because all of the problems relate to the topic—typically the one presented in the immediately preceding lesson—learners can choose the appropriate procedure for each practice problem before they read the problem. While this reduces the difficulty of the practice problems, learners are effectively relying on a crutch.
Taylor, K. & Rohrer, D. The Effects of Interleaved Practice. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 24, 837-848, doi:10.1002/acp.1598 (2010). See especially the graph at the top of page 843
See interleaving
van de Pohl 2010
Teachers should fade scaffolding after teaching. The duration over which the “fade” should occur is not quantified, but this writer thinks during the course of a single lesson is too fast for many low attaining learners.
van de Pohl, J., Volman, M. & Beishuizen, J. Educ Psychol Rev (2010) Scaffolding in Teacher- Student Interaction: A Decade of Research 22: 271
See scaffolding
van Merrienboer 1997
When teachers teach the “right grain size” attainment is raised.
Summary quote from Sweller 1998
target group analysis should be integrated with knowledge analysis (hierarchical analysis of the material to be learned) when designing instruction, so that the knowledge can be communicated to the learners at the right grain size (van Merrienboer, 1997)
Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A Four-Component Instructional Design Model for Technical Training, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Wiggins 2012
See feedback
Wiliam 2009
When teachers find out what learners know before and during teaching and alter their teaching responsively to this information, attainment is raised.
Assessment for Learning: why, what and how, Dylan Wiliam, An Inaugural Professorial Lecture, 2009, Institute of Education, University of London
Wiliam 2013
Good assessment can help learners learn at about double the rate 1 69 Assessment for learning Dylan Wiliam Learning and teaching YouTube
Wiliam 2016
How not to fly a plane Dylan Wiliam: Formative assessment