Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Usually the teacher will only need to consider the progress on topic of the topic they plan to teach, to decide which layer to teach each learner. However sometimes the teacher may need to look at the progress of topic of another topic e.g. for the topic expand linear the teacher may need to look at the learners skills in the topic simplify x/÷

Usually teaching Teaching up to 3 different layers will usually provide sufficient differentiation for the learners without making undue complexity for the teacher.

A When the teacher is more confident a scaffolded pair (where the questions in the easier layer of the pair includes some scaffolding, and the questions in the harder layer of the pair do not) can be counted as one layer for teaching purposes. The teacher talking about the differences “what scaffold might be included with this question” and “what might this question look like without the scaffold” can help learners move more successfully from the layer with the scaffold to the layer without.

Training on how to do this is found in https://timelypractice.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/CKB/pages/3110699127/Using+timely+practice#(5)-Get-started%3A-when-can-the-teacher-use-Plan-Teaching-within-the-app%3F

...

Here a tutor has a challenge of teaching 4 very different learners, who have “weird and unexpected” strengths and weaknesses.

Teach layer 8

Teach layer 8

Teach layer 5

Expand
titleDetailed look at a small group (of very different learner's that a tutor must teach)

Topic

 

Ava

Baz

Charlie

Dylan

Level of Learner

Detail

Ava’s teacher has no real idea of grade learner would gain if she took her GCSE exam tomorrow (she is new to the school).

Baz, would gain a grade, which would almost certainly be below grade 4 if he took his GCSE exam tomorrow.

Charlie might gain a grade 1 if she took her GCSE exam tomorrow.

Dylan is not expected to get any grade if he took his GCSE exam tomorrow.

Global target

N/A

Find and fill in some glaring gaps.

Fill in gaps and improve

  • his ability to read questions with meaning,

  • his accuracy

Charlie has some unexpected strengths, so here the task is to find out why she has so many weak areas, as well as build on her strengths.

Dylan, is one of the weakest learners in the school, so may well have been taught “too hard” in most his maths lessons - so err on the side of easy and see how learning embeds.

multiple

Image Removed

Teach layer 6

Teach layer 6

Teach layer 6

Teach layer 2

factor

 

Image Removed

Teach layer 6

Doesn’t need to learn - instead teach BIDMAS layer 4, while the other learners, learn factor skills.

Teach layer 6

Teach layer 1

BIDMAS - could be taught as an extension layer in the second half of a lesson - or see teaching suggestion given when planning teaching of the topic factor

Image Removed

Ava doesn’t know this, and her assessment on multiple and factor indicate she would be better learning other skills.

Baz can learn layer 4 while the others learn more factor skills

A surprise that Charlie knows this - her numeracy skills are higher than expected.

This topic will be too hard for Dylan. Due to his low level for learner, he wasn’t even asked questions form this layer. The teacher might teach him some 4 operation skills, which the rest of the learners already know.

decimal fraction

Image Removed

Teach layer 3

Teach layer 1

fraction +/-

Layers 1, 4 and 6 all rely on labelling a fraction line - so shouldn’t be too difficult for the teacher to teach these together. However layer 5 isn’t like this, so teach Baz separately.

Image Removed

Teach layer 6

Teach layer 4

Teach layer 1

fraction INTRO

 

Image Removed

Teach layer 11

 

Teach layer 5

Get Baz and Dylan to teach each other?

Teach layer 7

Teach layer 6

Get Baz and Dylan to teach each other?

...

titleWhy doesn’t timely practice collect full information on each learner in each topic?
Why doesn’t timely practice collect complete assessment for learning data on each learner in each topic?

We ask questions on a few key layers of a topic - which gives us a broad brush stroke picture of the learner’s skills and learning gaps - which are at an appropriate level for the learner. We know that quite often asking one question on a layer is insufficient to find if a layer is secure or not, so we always ask a second question if the learner seems to know the first. The assessment of the key layers is then used to gather more assessment for learning data in finer detail.

Mainly because

  • it would take too long: so we rule out some key layers that we consider too easy or too hard (based on the Level for Learner the teacher inputs into the app),

  • it would more more traumatic for learners: so

...

  • we try and remove layers which we think would be too hard for each learner based on the responses to earlier questions. Hence the teacher can say to the class “Everybody will get some too easy, some OK and some too hard questions in their learned and remembered section, this is to help the app find out for the teacher, what to teach you soon”

Also because

  • there is little point in assessing a scaffolded layer, which can’t be understood, until after being taught.

See auto pre assess for more detailed information

(9) … then plan the teaching and learning activities of the lesson

...